M3-8100Y vs Ryzen 3 2200GE
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 2200GE and M3-8100Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1449 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | Intel Core M3 |
| Power efficiency | 10.24 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) | Amber Lake (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 19 April 2018 (6 years ago) | 28 August 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $281 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 2200GE and M3-8100Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | OPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 32 | 16 |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 2200GE and M3-8100Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200GE and M3-8100Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200GE and M3-8100Y are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200GE and M3-8100Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 29.861 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200GE and M3-8100Y.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 10 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 4.50 | 1.98 |
| Recency | 19 April 2018 | 28 August 2018 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 5 Watt |
Ryzen 3 2200GE has 127.3% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores.
M3-8100Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 600% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 2200GE and M3-8100Y. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 3 2200GE is a desktop processor while M3-8100Y is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200GE and M3-8100Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
