EPYC 7301 vs Ryzen 3 1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 1200
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.14

EPYC 7301 outperforms Ryzen 3 1200 by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 1200 and EPYC 7301 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1329741
Place by popularity100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.021.57
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameSummit Ridge (Zen)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109$825
Current price$352 (3.2x MSRP)$1500 (1.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 1200 has 29% better value for money than EPYC 7301.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 1200 and EPYC 7301 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,800 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 1200 and EPYC 7301 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and EPYC 7301. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2667 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and EPYC 7301 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and EPYC 7301. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and EPYC 7301.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 1200 4.14
EPYC 7301 9.69
+134%

EPYC 7301 outperforms Ryzen 3 1200 by 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 1200 6407
EPYC 7301 14991
+134%

EPYC 7301 outperforms Ryzen 3 1200 by 134% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.14 9.69
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Cost $109 $825
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 170 Watt

The EPYC 7301 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 1200 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 1200 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7301 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 1200 and EPYC 7301, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 1200
Ryzen 3 1200
AMD EPYC 7301
EPYC 7301

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2712 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 1200 or EPYC 7301, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.