Atom Z500 vs Phenom X4 9650
Aggregate performance score
Phenom X4 9650 outperforms Atom Z500 by a whopping 581% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Phenom X4 9650 and Atom Z500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2404 | 3283 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 1.08 | 23.30 |
| Architecture codename | Agena (2007−2008) | Silverthorne (2008−2010) |
| Release date | March 2008 (16 years ago) | 2 April 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $45 |
Detailed specifications
Phenom X4 9650 and Atom Z500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 0.8 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 8 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 56 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 285 mm2 | 24.18 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | 47 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.80 -1.1V |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom X4 9650 and Atom Z500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM2+ | PBGA441 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 0.65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Atom Z500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Phenom X4 9650 and Atom Z500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Atom Z500 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.09 | 0.16 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Phenom X4 9650 has a 581.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Atom Z500, on the other hand, has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Phenom X4 9650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z500 in performance tests.
Note that Phenom X4 9650 is a desktop processor while Atom Z500 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9650 and Atom Z500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
