Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs Phenom X4 9650
Primary details
Comparing Phenom X4 9650 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2302 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.72 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M3 |
| Architecture codename | Agena (2007−2008) | no data |
| Release date | March 2008 (16 years ago) | 30 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Current price | $23 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom X4 9650 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1410 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.748 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 4.06 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 285 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | 92000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom X4 9650 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM2+ | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 78 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 14 |
| Threads | 4 | 1410 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 78 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Phenom X4 9650 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom X4 9650 is a desktop processor while Apple M3 Max 14-Core is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9650 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
