Athlon 1300 vs Phenom X4 9500

VS

Primary details

Comparing Phenom X4 9500 and Athlon 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2472not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.97no data
Architecture codenameAgena (2007−2008)Thunderbird B (2000−2001)
Release dateNovember 2007 (17 years ago)March 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom X4 9500 and Athlon 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm180 nm
Die size285 mm2120 mm2
Number of transistors450 million37 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X4 9500 and Athlon 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2+A
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt68 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9500 and Athlon 1300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X4 9500 and Athlon 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 68 Watt

Phenom X4 9500 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 1300, on the other hand, has 39.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Phenom X4 9500 and Athlon 1300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9500 and Athlon 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X4 9500
Phenom X4 9500
AMD Athlon 1300
Athlon 1300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 54 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7 votes

Rate Athlon 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom X4 9500 or Athlon 1300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.