Intel Celeron J3160 vs AMD Phenom X4 9100e

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Phenom X4 9100e
0.83
+1.2%

Phenom X4 9100e outperforms Celeron J3160 by 1% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Phenom X4 9100e and Celeron J3160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24352445
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.451.66
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameAgena (2007−2008)Airmont (2015−2016)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years old)15 January 2016 (8 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107
Current price$32 $70 (0.7x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Phenom X4 9100e has 48% better value for money than Celeron J3160.

Technical specs

Phenom X4 9100e and Celeron J3160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.24 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size285 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors450 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X4 9100e and Celeron J3160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2+FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X4 9100e and Celeron J3160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Phenom X4 9100e and Celeron J3160 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9100e and Celeron J3160 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X4 9100e and Celeron J3160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3L-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom X4 9100e and Celeron J3160 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom X4 9100e and Celeron J3160 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X4 9100e and Celeron J3160.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data5
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom X4 9100e 0.83
+1.2%
Celeron J3160 0.82

Phenom X4 9100e outperforms Celeron J3160 by 1% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Phenom X4 9100e 1279
+1.1%
Celeron J3160 1265

Phenom X4 9100e outperforms Celeron J3160 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.83 0.82
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

We couldn't decide between Phenom X4 9100e and Celeron J3160. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9100e and Celeron J3160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X4 9100e
Phenom X4 9100e
Intel Celeron J3160
Celeron J3160

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 12 votes

Rate AMD Phenom X4 9100e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 40 votes

Rate Intel Celeron J3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom X4 9100e or Celeron J3160, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.