Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Phenom X3 8650

Place in the ranking	2637	2598
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency	0.77	2.16
Architecture codename	Toliman (2008)	Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date	April 2008 (16 years ago)	26 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$80

Detailed specifications

Phenom X3 8650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	3 (Tri-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	3	2
Boost clock speed	2.3 GHz	2.1 GHz
Bus rate	no data	800 MHz
L1 cache	128 KB (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	1 MB
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Die size	285 mm²	107 mm²
Number of transistors	450 million	410 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X3 8650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	AM2+	Socket P PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	35 Watt

Security technologies

Phenom X3 8650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X3 8650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom X3 8650 0.77

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 0.80
+3.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom X3 8650 1218

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275
+4.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.77	0.80
Physical cores	3	2
Threads	3	2
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	35 Watt

Phenom X3 8650 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500, on the other hand, has a 3.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Phenom X3 8650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500.

Note that Phenom X3 8650 is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X3 8650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.