Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) vs Phenom X3 8450

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Phenom X3 8450 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2507not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.29no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameToliman (2008)Kentsfield (2007)
Release dateApril 2008 (16 years ago)23 July 2007 (16 years ago)
Current price$22 $43

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom X3 8450 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads34
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)8 MB (shared)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size285 mm22x 143 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data62 °C
Number of transistors450 million582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X3 8450 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2+775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X3 8450 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X3 8450 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X3 8450 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X3 8450 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W).

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 3 4
Threads 3 4

We couldn't decide between Phenom X3 8450 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X3 8450 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X3 8450
Phenom X3 8450
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 105 votes

Rate Phenom X3 8450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 360 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom X3 8450 or Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.