FX-9830P vs Phenom II X6 1100T BE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
3.62
+72.4%
FX-9830P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.10

Phenom II X6 1100T BE outperforms FX-9830P by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X6 1100T BE and FX-9830P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15061885
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency2.745.67
Architecture codenameThuban (2010)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date7 December 2010 (14 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X6 1100T BE and FX-9830P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)320 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per module)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size346 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors904 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X6 1100T BE and FX-9830P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FP4
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and FX-9830P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and FX-9830P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and FX-9830P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and FX-9830P.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE 3.62
+72.4%
FX-9830P 2.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE 5745
+72.4%
FX-9830P 3332

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.62 2.10
Recency 7 December 2010 31 May 2016
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 35 Watt

Phenom II X6 1100T BE has a 72.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

FX-9830P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9830P in performance tests.

Note that Phenom II X6 1100T BE is a desktop processor while FX-9830P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1100T BE and FX-9830P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
AMD FX-9830P
FX-9830P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 459 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1100T BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 113 votes

Rate FX-9830P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X6 1100T BE or FX-9830P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.