Atom C3758 vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
3.13
+7.9%
Atom C3758
2017
8 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
2.90

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms Atom C3758 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Atom C3758 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16141657
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.51
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.1210.98
Architecture codenameThuban (2010)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date1 May 2010 (14 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Atom C3758 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads68
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache128 KB (per core)448 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size346 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data82 °C
Number of transistors904 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Atom C3758 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Atom C3758. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Atom C3758 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Atom C3758 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Atom C3758. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 2400
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Atom C3758.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) 3.13
+7.9%
Atom C3758 2.90

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) 4965
+7.6%
Atom C3758 4614

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.13 2.90
Recency 1 May 2010 15 August 2017
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 6 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 25 Watt

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) has a 7.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom C3758, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 280% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Atom C3758.

Note that Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is a desktop processor while Atom C3758 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Atom C3758, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1623 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) or Atom C3758, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.