Celeron M 353 vs Phenom II X4 N970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2687not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series4x AMD Phenom IICeleron M
Power efficiency1.14no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date16 December 2010 (14 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 N970 and Celeron M 353 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz0.9 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz400 MHz
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 N970 and Celeron M 353 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt5 Watt

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Phenom II X4 N970 1861
+340%
Celeron M 353 423

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 5 Watt

Phenom II X4 N970 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 353, on the other hand, has 600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Phenom II X4 N970 and Intel Celeron M 353. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 N970
Phenom II X4 N970
Intel Celeron M 353
Celeron M 353

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 87 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 N970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 28 votes

Rate Celeron M 353 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Phenom II X4 N970 and Celeron M 353, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.