Xeon Platinum 8592+ vs Phenom II X4 N970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 N970
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.94
Xeon Platinum 8592+
2023
64 cores / 128 threads, 350 Watt
47.80
+4985%

Xeon Platinum 8592+ outperforms Phenom II X4 N970 by a whopping 4985% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking268748
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.12
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series4x AMD Phenom IIno data
Power efficiency1.145.77
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date16 December 2010 (14 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,600

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 N970 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data320 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 N970 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketS14677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and Xeon Platinum 8592+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Phenom II X4 N970 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and Xeon Platinum 8592+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 N970 and Xeon Platinum 8592+.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Phenom II X4 N970 0.94
Xeon Platinum 8592+ 47.80
+4985%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Phenom II X4 N970 1647
Xeon Platinum 8592+ 84013
+5001%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.94 47.80
Recency 16 December 2010 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 350 Watt

Phenom II X4 N970 has 900% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8592+, on the other hand, has a 4985.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Phenom II X4 N970 in performance tests.

Be aware that Phenom II X4 N970 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8592+ is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 N970
Phenom II X4 N970
Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+
Xeon Platinum 8592+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 87 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 N970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 11 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8592 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Phenom II X4 N970 and Xeon Platinum 8592+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.