Phenom II X4 X920 BE vs Phenom II X4 N950
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X4 N950 outperforms Phenom II X4 X920 BE by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 N950 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2004 | 2062 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | 4x AMD Phenom II |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 4 October 2010 (13 years ago) | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 N950 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus support | 3600 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 N950 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | integrated DDR3-1333 memory controller, HyperTransport 3.0, Enhanced Virus Protection, AMD64, SSE4A, unlocked multiplier |
| VirusProtect | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Phenom II X4 N950 outperforms Phenom II X4 X920 BE by 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Phenom II X4 X920 BE outperforms Phenom II X4 N950 by 7% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Phenom II X4 X920 BE outperforms Phenom II X4 N950 by 8% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Phenom II X4 X920 BE outperforms Phenom II X4 N950 by 6% in 3DMark06 CPU.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Phenom II X4 N950 outperforms Phenom II X4 X920 BE by 2% in wPrime 32.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.61 | 1.50 |
| Recency | 4 October 2010 | 12 May 2010 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Phenom II X4 N950 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 N950 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
