Phenom II X4 X920 BE vs Phenom II X4 N950

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 N950
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.62
+7.3%
Phenom II X4 X920 BE
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.51

Phenom II X4 N950 outperforms Phenom II X4 X920 BE by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 N950 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21022161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series4x AMD Phenom II4x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency4.223.06
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date4 October 2010 (14 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 N950 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache512 KB256 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 N950 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHyperTransport 3.0, Enhanced Virus Protection, AMD64, SSE4A, unlocked multiplier
VirusProtect-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 N950 1.62
+7.3%
Phenom II X4 X920 BE 1.51

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Phenom II X4 N950 1816
Phenom II X4 X920 BE 1935
+6.6%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Phenom II X4 N950 6554
Phenom II X4 X920 BE 7082
+8.1%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Phenom II X4 N950 2974
Phenom II X4 X920 BE 3164
+6.4%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Phenom II X4 N950 17.8
Phenom II X4 X920 BE 17.5
+1.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.62 1.51
Recency 4 October 2010 12 May 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Phenom II X4 N950 has a 7.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Phenom II X4 N950 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 N950 and Phenom II X4 X920 BE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 N950
Phenom II X4 N950
AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE
Phenom II X4 X920 BE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 28 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 N950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 X920 BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 N950 or Phenom II X4 X920 BE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.