i7-2920XM Extreme vs Phenom II X4 N950
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 N950 and Core i7-2920XM Extreme processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2176 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | Intel Core i7EE |
Power efficiency | 4.22 | no data |
Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | 4 October 2010 (14 years ago) | 9 January 2011 (14 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,096 |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 N950 and Core i7-2920XM Extreme basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 4 × 5 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 25 |
L1 cache | 512 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 8 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | no data | 216 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 1160 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 N950 and Core i7-2920XM Extreme compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | S1 | Socket G2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Core i7-2920XM Extreme. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Phenom II X4 N950 and Core i7-2920XM Extreme technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Core i7-2920XM Extreme are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 N950 and Core i7-2920XM Extreme. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-1600 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.598 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 4 October 2010 | 9 January 2011 |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Phenom II X4 N950 has 57.1% lower power consumption.
i7-2920XM Extreme, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 N950 and Core i7-2920XM Extreme. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.