Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Phenom II X4 N950

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 N950 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2102not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series4x AMD Phenom IIIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency4.22no data
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date4 October 2010 (14 years ago)1 February 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 N950 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache512 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 N950 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1Socket P 478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Security technologies

Phenom II X4 N950 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 N950 2485
+293%
Celeron Dual-Core T3300 633

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 October 2010 1 February 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2

Phenom II X4 N950 has an age advantage of 8 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 N950 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 N950 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 N950
Phenom II X4 N950
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Celeron Dual-Core T3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 28 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 N950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 35 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 N950 or Celeron Dual-Core T3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.