Opteron 152 vs Phenom II X4 955 BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 955 BE and Opteron 152 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 3129 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.25 |
| Architecture codename | Deneb (2009−2011) | Venus (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 23 April 2009 (15 years ago) | 2 August 2005 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 955 BE and Opteron 152 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 258 mm2 | 115 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 758 million | 114 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 955 BE and Opteron 152 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | 939 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 104 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 955 BE and Opteron 152 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 955 BE and Opteron 152. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 955 BE and Opteron 152.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 April 2009 | 2 August 2005 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 104 Watt |
Phenom II X4 955 BE has an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Opteron 152, on the other hand, has 20.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 955 BE and Opteron 152. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X4 955 BE is a desktop processor while Opteron 152 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 955 BE and Opteron 152, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
