Athlon 240GE vs Phenom II X4 955 (95W)
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and Athlon 240GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1639 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.42 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Athlon |
| Architecture codename | Deneb (2009−2011) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) | 21 December 2018 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $75 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and Athlon 240GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 35 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 258 mm2 | 209.78 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 758 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and Athlon 240GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM3 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and Athlon 240GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and Athlon 240GE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and Athlon 240GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and Athlon 240GE.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 April 2009 | 21 December 2018 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
Phenom II X4 955 (95W) has 100% more physical cores.
Athlon 240GE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and Athlon 240GE. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and Athlon 240GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
