Atom D2700 vs Phenom II X4 925

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 925 and Atom D2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2180not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.42no data
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date11 May 2009 (15 years ago)1 November 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160$52

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 925 and Atom D2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz0.13 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size258 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors758 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 925 and Atom D2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 925 and Atom D2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
AMTno data-
HD Audiono data+

Security technologies

Phenom II X4 925 and Atom D2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 925 and Atom D2700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 925 and Atom D2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X4 925 and Atom D2700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 925 and Atom D2700.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanesno data4
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 925 2272
+387%
Atom D2700 467

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom II X4 925 322
+185%
Atom D2700 113

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom II X4 925 966
+204%
Atom D2700 318

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2009 1 November 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 10 Watt

Phenom II X4 925 has 100% more physical cores.

Atom D2700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 925 and Atom D2700. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Phenom II X4 925 is a desktop processor while Atom D2700 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 925 and Atom D2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 925
Phenom II X4 925
Intel Atom D2700
Atom D2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 323 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 29 votes

Rate Atom D2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 925 or Atom D2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.