Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Phenom II X4 840
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 840 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2128 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.08 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Power efficiency | 1.51 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Propus (2009−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $90 | $134 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 840 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 169 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 300 million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 840 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3 | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 840 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 840 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 840 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2011 | 1 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 10 Watt |
Phenom II X4 840 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, on the other hand, has 850% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 840 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X4 840 is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 840 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
