Core i5-12450H vs Phenom II X4 820
Aggregate performance score
i5-12450H outperforms Phenom II X4 820 by a whopping 714% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 820 and Core i5-12450H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2152 | 660 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 1 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.10 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-P |
| Architecture codename | Deneb (2009−2011) | Alder Lake-H (2022) |
| Release date | September 2009 (14 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $90 | no data |
| Current price | $58 (0.6x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 820 and Core i5-12450H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 704 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 12 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 258 mm2 | 217 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 758 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 820 and Core i5-12450H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | BGA1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Core i5-12450H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Phenom II X4 820 and Core i5-12450H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Core i5-12450H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Core i5-12450H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Core i5-12450H.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i5-12450H outperforms Phenom II X4 820 by 714% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i5-12450H outperforms Phenom II X4 820 by 717% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.36 | 11.07 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 45 Watt |
i5-12450H has a 714% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 111.1% lower power consumption.
The Core i5-12450H is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 820 in performance tests.
Note that Phenom II X4 820 is a desktop processor while Core i5-12450H is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 820 and Core i5-12450H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
