Celeron N3060 vs Phenom II X4 820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 820 and Celeron N3060 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2154not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.10no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release dateSeptember 2009 (14 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90$107
Current price$58 (0.6x MSRP)$243 (2.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 820 and Celeron N3060 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.48 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size258 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors758 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 820 and Celeron N3060 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Celeron N3060. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
Statusno dataLaunched
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Phenom II X4 820 and Celeron N3060 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Celeron N3060 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Celeron N3060. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X4 820 and Celeron N3060 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Celeron N3060 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Celeron N3060.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Phenom II X4 820 2086
+216%
Celeron N3060 661

Phenom II X4 820 outperforms Celeron N3060 by 216% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Cost $90 $107
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 6 Watt

We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 820 and Celeron N3060. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Phenom II X4 820 is a desktop processor while Celeron N3060 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 820 and Celeron N3060, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 820
Phenom II X4 820
Intel Celeron N3060
Celeron N3060

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 55 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 708 votes

Rate Celeron N3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 820 or Celeron N3060, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.