Celeron N2840 vs Phenom II X4 650T
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 650T and Celeron N2840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
Architecture codename | Zosma (2010−2011) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
Release date | 1 July 2011 (13 years ago) | 22 May 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 650T and Celeron N2840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.58 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 112 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | 346 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 904 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 650T and Celeron N2840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM3 | FCBGA1170 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 7.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 650T and Celeron N2840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Smart Connect | no data | + |
Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Phenom II X4 650T and Celeron N2840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 650T and Celeron N2840 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 650T and Celeron N2840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.32 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 792 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X4 650T and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 650T and Celeron N2840.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
USB revision | no data | 3.0 and 2.0 |
Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
Number of USB ports | no data | 5 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 July 2011 | 22 May 2014 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 7 Watt |
Phenom II X4 650T has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron N2840, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1257.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 650T and Celeron N2840. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X4 650T is a desktop processor while Celeron N2840 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 650T and Celeron N2840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.