Opteron 3380 vs Phenom II X3 P860

VS

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X3 P860 and Opteron 3380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1712
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series3x AMD Phenom IIno data
Power efficiencyno data3.79
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Delhi (2012−2013)
Release date4 October 2010 (14 years ago)4 December 2012 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X3 P860 and Opteron 3380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads38
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache384 KB384 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB8192 KB
L3 cacheno data8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X3 P860 and Opteron 3380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 P860 and Opteron 3380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a)no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 P860 and Opteron 3380 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 P860 and Opteron 3380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X3 P860 and Opteron 3380.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 October 2010 4 December 2012
Physical cores 3 8
Threads 3 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

Phenom II X3 P860 has 160% lower power consumption.

Opteron 3380, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Phenom II X3 P860 and Opteron 3380. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Phenom II X3 P860 is a notebook processor while Opteron 3380 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 P860 and Opteron 3380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X3 P860
Phenom II X3 P860
AMD Opteron  3380
Opteron 3380

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 P860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Opteron 3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X3 P860 or Opteron 3380, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.