Apple M2 Pro vs Phenom II X3 P820
Aggregate performance score
Apple M2 Pro outperforms Phenom II X3 P820 by a whopping 1976% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X3 P820 and Apple M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2740 | 537 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | 3x AMD Phenom II | Apple Apple M-Series |
Power efficiency | 2.50 | no data |
Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | no data |
Release date | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X3 P820 and Apple M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
Threads | 3 | 12 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.424 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 3.3 MB |
L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 36 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 24 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
Number of transistors | no data | 40000 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X3 P820 and Apple M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | S1 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 2424 ‑ 3504 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 P820 and Apple M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Virtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a) | no data |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 P820 and Apple M2 Pro are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 P820 and Apple M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.66 | 13.70 |
Recency | 12 May 2010 | 17 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 3 | 12 |
Threads | 3 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 2424 Watt |
Phenom II X3 P820 has 9596% lower power consumption.
Apple M2 Pro, on the other hand, has a 1975.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M2 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X3 P820 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 P820 and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.