Turion II P560 vs Phenom II X3 N870

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X3 N870
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 35 Watt
1.06
+92.7%
Turion II P560
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.55

Phenom II X3 N870 outperforms Turion II P560 by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X3 N870 and Turion II P560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24342844
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series3x AMD Phenom IIAMD Turion II
Power efficiency2.872.08
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date16 December 2010 (14 years ago)19 October 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X3 N870 and Turion II P560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads32
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache384 KB265 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X3 N870 and Turion II P560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1 (S1g4)S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 N870 and Turion II P560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-VMMX, 3DNow!, SSE(1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 N870 and Turion II P560 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 N870 and Turion II P560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.06 0.55
Recency 16 December 2010 19 October 2010
Physical cores 3 2
Threads 3 2
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Phenom II X3 N870 has a 92.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Turion II P560, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X3 N870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II P560 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 N870 and Turion II P560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X3 N870
Phenom II X3 N870
AMD Turion II P560
Turion II P560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 33 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 N870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Turion II P560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X3 N870 or Turion II P560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.