Phenom II X3 N870 vs Turion II P540

Aggregate performance score

Turion II P540
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.62
Phenom II X3 N870
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 35 Watt
1.10
+77.4%

Phenom II X3 N870 outperforms Turion II P540 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II P540 and Phenom II X3 N870 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27852414
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion II3x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency2.262.87
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)16 December 2010 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II P540 and Phenom II X3 N870 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads23
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB1.5 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion II P540 and Phenom II X3 N870 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1 (S1g4)S1 (S1g4)
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II P540 and Phenom II X3 N870. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.086x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II P540 and Phenom II X3 N870 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II P540 and Phenom II X3 N870. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 1.10
Recency 12 May 2010 16 December 2010
Physical cores 2 3
Threads 2 3
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Turion II P540 has 40% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X3 N870, on the other hand, has a 77.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Phenom II X3 N870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II P540 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II P540 and Phenom II X3 N870, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II P540
Turion II P540
AMD Phenom II X3 N870
Phenom II X3 N870

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 30 votes

Rate Turion II P540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 33 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 N870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II P540 or Phenom II X3 N870, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.