Sempron 2600+ vs Phenom II X3 720

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X3 720 and Sempron 2600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2461not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.16no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.98no data
Architecture codenameHeka (2009−2010)Palermo (2001−2005)
Release date1 January 2010 (14 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$60

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X3 720 and Sempron 2600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads31
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256K
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size258 mm2144 mm2
Number of transistors758 million69 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X3 720 and Sempron 2600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3754
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt62 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 720 and Sempron 2600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X3 720 and Sempron 2600+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X3 720 1575
+523%
Sempron 2600+ 253

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 3 1
Threads 3 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 62 Watt

Phenom II X3 720 has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.

Sempron 2600+, on the other hand, has 53.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Phenom II X3 720 and Sempron 2600+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 720 and Sempron 2600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X3 720
Phenom II X3 720
AMD Sempron 2600+
Sempron 2600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 85 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 720 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 61 vote

Rate Sempron 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X3 720 or Sempron 2600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.