Mobile Pentium 4 520 vs Phenom II X3 710

VS

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2471not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.22no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataMobile Pentium 4
Power efficiency0.97no data
Architecture codenameHeka (2009−2010)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release date9 February 2009 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads31
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size258 mm2no data
Number of transistors758 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt91 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 3 1
Threads 3 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 91 Watt

Phenom II X3 710 has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Mobile Pentium 4 520, on the other hand, has 4.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Phenom II X3 710 is a desktop processor while Mobile Pentium 4 520 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X3 710
Phenom II X3 710
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 520
Mobile Pentium 4 520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 53 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 7 votes

Rate Mobile Pentium 4 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X3 710 or Mobile Pentium 4 520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.