Xeon Gold 6326 vs Phenom II X2 N620
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 6326 outperforms Phenom II X2 N620 by a whopping 2607% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X2 N620 and Xeon Gold 6326 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2582 | 234 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | 2x AMD Phenom II | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.22 | 11.36 |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X2 N620 and Xeon Gold 6326 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 78 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X2 N620 and Xeon Gold 6326 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | S1 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 185 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X2 N620 and Xeon Gold 6326. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HyperTransport 3.0, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Vurtualization | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Phenom II X2 N620 and Xeon Gold 6326 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X2 N620 and Xeon Gold 6326 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X2 N620 and Xeon Gold 6326. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X2 N620 and Xeon Gold 6326.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.82 | 22.20 |
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 6 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 2 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 185 Watt |
Phenom II X2 N620 has 428.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6326, on the other hand, has a 2607.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
The Xeon Gold 6326 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X2 N620 in performance tests.
Be aware that Phenom II X2 N620 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6326 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X2 N620 and Xeon Gold 6326, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
