Ryzen 5 7540U vs Phenom II X2 N620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X2 N620
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.74
Ryzen 5 7540U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
10.55
+1326%

Ryzen 5 7540U outperforms Phenom II X2 N620 by a whopping 1326% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2868832
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Phenom IIAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency0.9016.01
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date12 May 2010 (15 years ago)3 May 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X2 N620 and Ryzen 5 7540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X2 N620 and Ryzen 5 7540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X2 N620 and Ryzen 5 7540U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHyperTransport 3.0, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Vurtualizationno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X2 N620 and Ryzen 5 7540U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X2 N620 and Ryzen 5 7540U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X2 N620 and Ryzen 5 7540U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Phenom II X2 N620 0.74
Ryzen 5 7540U 10.55
+1326%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom II X2 N620 352
Ryzen 5 7540U 2100
+497%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom II X2 N620 647
Ryzen 5 7540U 8033
+1142%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Phenom II X2 N620 2503
Ryzen 5 7540U 7365
+194%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Phenom II X2 N620 4810
Ryzen 5 7540U 27647
+475%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Phenom II X2 N620 2282
Ryzen 5 7540U 11925
+423%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 10.55
Recency 12 May 2010 3 May 2023
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 5 7540U has a 1325.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7540U is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Phenom II X2 N620 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X2 N620
Phenom II X2 N620
AMD Ryzen 5 7540U
Ryzen 5 7540U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 14 votes

Rate Phenom II X2 N620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 62 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7540U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Phenom II X2 N620 and Ryzen 5 7540U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.