Opteron 846 vs Athlon 64 FX-62

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Opteron 846 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2787not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAthlon 64 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency0.48no data
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Athens (2003−2006)
Release dateno dataSeptember 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Opteron 846 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Die size220 mm2193 mm2
Number of transistors243 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Opteron 846 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18
SocketAM2940
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt89 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Opteron 846. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 89 Watt

Athlon 64 FX-62 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 846, on the other hand, has 40.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-62 and Opteron 846. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 FX-62 is a desktop processor while Opteron 846 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-62 and Opteron 846, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
Athlon 64 FX-62
AMD Opteron 846
Opteron 846

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 10 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-62 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 846 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-62 or Opteron 846, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.