EPYC 7343 vs Pentium T4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium T4200 and EPYC 7343 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.21
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data13.66
Architecture codenameno dataMilan (2021−2023)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium T4200 and EPYC 7343 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threadsno data32
Base clock speed2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Multiplierno data32
L1 cacheno data1 MB
L2 cacheno data8 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium T4200 and EPYC 7343 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPGA478SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt190 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium T4200 and EPYC 7343. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium T4200 and EPYC 7343 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium T4200 and EPYC 7343 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium T4200 and EPYC 7343. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium T4200 and EPYC 7343.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium T4200 714
EPYC 7343 43561
+6001%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium T4200 219
EPYC 7343 1533
+600%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium T4200 369
EPYC 7343 11934
+3134%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2009 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 190 Watt

Pentium T4200 has 442.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7343, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium T4200 and EPYC 7343. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium T4200 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7343 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium T4200 and EPYC 7343, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium T4200
Pentium T4200
AMD EPYC 7343
EPYC 7343

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 18 votes

Rate Pentium T4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7343 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium T4200 or EPYC 7343, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.