Celeron N2920 vs Pentium Silver J5040

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Silver J5040
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
2.10
+244%

Pentium Silver J5040 outperforms Celeron N2920 by a whopping 244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Silver J5040 and Celeron N2920 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18022681
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.29no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date4 November 2019 (4 years ago)1 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107
Current price$649 $278 (2.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium Silver J5040 and Celeron N2920 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Silver J5040 and Celeron N2920 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Silver J5040 and Celeron N2920. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connectno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Pentium Silver J5040 and Celeron N2920 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Silver J5040 and Celeron N2920 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Silver J5040 and Celeron N2920. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 605Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency800 MHz844 MHz
Execution Units18no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium Silver J5040 and Celeron N2920 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium Silver J5040 and Celeron N2920 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium Silver J5040 and Celeron N2920 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Silver J5040 and Celeron N2920.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes64
USB revision2.0/3.03.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports85
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium Silver J5040 2.10
+244%
Celeron N2920 0.61

Pentium Silver J5040 outperforms Celeron N2920 by 244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium Silver J5040 3244
+241%
Celeron N2920 950

Pentium Silver J5040 outperforms Celeron N2920 by 241% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Pentium Silver J5040 2688
+161%
Celeron N2920 1030

Pentium Silver J5040 outperforms Celeron N2920 by 161% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium Silver J5040 8279
+135%
Celeron N2920 3530

Pentium Silver J5040 outperforms Celeron N2920 by 135% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium Silver J5040 4296
+131%
Celeron N2920 1861

Pentium Silver J5040 outperforms Celeron N2920 by 131% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Pentium Silver J5040 15.29
+109%
Celeron N2920 31.99

Celeron N2920 outperforms Pentium Silver J5040 by 109% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pentium Silver J5040 3
+144%
Celeron N2920 1

Pentium Silver J5040 outperforms Celeron N2920 by 144% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium Silver J5040 279
+135%
Celeron N2920 119

Pentium Silver J5040 outperforms Celeron N2920 by 135% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pentium Silver J5040 91
+180%
Celeron N2920 33

Pentium Silver J5040 outperforms Celeron N2920 by 180% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pentium Silver J5040 1.09
+187%
Celeron N2920 0.38

Pentium Silver J5040 outperforms Celeron N2920 by 187% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium Silver J5040 2
+852%
Celeron N2920 0.2

Pentium Silver J5040 outperforms Celeron N2920 by 852% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium Silver J5040 1391
Celeron N2920 1728
+24.2%

Celeron N2920 outperforms Pentium Silver J5040 by 24% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium Silver J5040 19
+130%
Celeron N2920 8

Pentium Silver J5040 outperforms Celeron N2920 by 130% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium Silver J5040 89
+112%
Celeron N2920 42

Pentium Silver J5040 outperforms Celeron N2920 by 112% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.10 0.61
Recency 4 November 2019 1 December 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 7 Watt

The Pentium Silver J5040 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2920 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium Silver J5040 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2920 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Silver J5040 and Celeron N2920, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Silver J5040
Pentium Silver J5040
Intel Celeron N2920
Celeron N2920

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 169 votes

Rate Pentium Silver J5040 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 32 votes

Rate Celeron N2920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Silver J5040 or Celeron N2920, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.