EPYC 7502P vs Pentium SU4100

Primary details

Comparing Pentium SU4100 and EPYC 7502P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated127
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.15
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data16.82
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,300

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium SU4100 and EPYC 7502P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz3.35 GHz
Multiplierno data25
L1 cache64 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size107 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium SU4100 and EPYC 7502P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA956TR4
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium SU4100 and EPYC 7502P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Pentium SU4100 and EPYC 7502P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium SU4100 and EPYC 7502P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium SU4100 and EPYC 7502P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium SU4100 492
EPYC 7502P 50818
+10229%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium SU4100 165
EPYC 7502P 963
+484%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium SU4100 291
EPYC 7502P 7822
+2588%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 7 August 2019
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 180 Watt

Pentium SU4100 has 1700% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7502P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium SU4100 and EPYC 7502P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium SU4100 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7502P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium SU4100 and EPYC 7502P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium SU4100
Pentium SU4100
AMD EPYC 7502P
EPYC 7502P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 13 votes

Rate Pentium SU4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7502P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium SU4100 or EPYC 7502P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.