Xeon Platinum 8571N vs Pentium P6100
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8571N outperforms Pentium P6100 by a whopping 7656% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium P6100 and Xeon Platinum 8571N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2715 | 42 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Pentium | no data |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Emerald Rapids |
| Release date | 26 September 2010 (13 years ago) | 1 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $12 | no data |
| Current price | $14 (1.2x MSRP) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium P6100 and Xeon Platinum 8571N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 52 |
| Threads | 2 | 104 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus support | 2500 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 300 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 2x 763 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 78 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 78 °C |
| Number of transistors | 384 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium P6100 and Xeon Platinum 8571N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PGA988 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 300 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium P6100 and Xeon Platinum 8571N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
Security technologies
Pentium P6100 and Xeon Platinum 8571N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium P6100 and Xeon Platinum 8571N are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium P6100 and Xeon Platinum 8571N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC) |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors | N/A |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 667 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium P6100 and Xeon Platinum 8571N integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium P6100 and Xeon Platinum 8571N.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 1 | 80 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon Platinum 8571N outperforms Pentium P6100 by 7656% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon Platinum 8571N outperforms Pentium P6100 by 7671% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.57 | 44.21 |
| Recency | 26 September 2010 | 1 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 52 |
| Threads | 2 | 104 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 300 Watt |
The Xeon Platinum 8571N is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium P6100 in performance tests.
Be aware that Pentium P6100 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8571N is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium P6100 and Xeon Platinum 8571N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
