Pentium N3710 vs Pentium N4200

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pentium N4200
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
1.41
+56.7%
Pentium N3710
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.90

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 57% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3710 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20882401
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Pentium
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release date1 September 2016 (7 years old)1 April 2016 (8 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$161
Current price$352 (2.2x MSRP)$378 (2.3x MSRP)

Technical specs

Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3710 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.56 GHz
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3710 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1296FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3710. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP--
Smart Response--
GPIO++
Smart Connect--
StatusLaunchedLaunched
HD Audio++
RST--

Security technologies

Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3710 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Boot++
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection++
OS Guard+-
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3710 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
VT-i--
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3710. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 505Intel HD Graphics 405
Max video memory8 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency750 MHz700 MHz
Execution Units1816
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3710 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3710 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX++
OpenGL++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3710.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes64
USB revision2.0/3.02.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports22
Number of USB ports85
Integrated LAN--
UART++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium N4200 1.41
+56.7%
Pentium N3710 0.90

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 57% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium N4200 2167
+56.3%
Pentium N3710 1386

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 56% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Pentium N4200 1653
+24.9%
Pentium N3710 1324

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 25% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium N4200 5217
+12.1%
Pentium N3710 4653

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 12% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium N4200 2636
+6.6%
Pentium N3710 2474

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 7% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Pentium N4200 22.58
+3%
Pentium N3710 23.26

Pentium N3710 outperforms Pentium N4200 by 3% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pentium N4200 2
+27.4%
Pentium N3710 2

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 27% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium N4200 163
+12.4%
Pentium N3710 145

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 12% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium N4200 52
+26.8%
Pentium N3710 41

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 27% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pentium N4200 0.65
+32.7%
Pentium N3710 0.49

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 33% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N4200 1.4
+42.9%
Pentium N3710 1

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 43% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N4200 944
Pentium N3710 1004
+6.4%

Pentium N3710 outperforms Pentium N4200 by 6% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N4200 60
+13.6%
Pentium N3710 53

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 14% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N4200 12
+12.9%
Pentium N3710 11

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 13% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium N4200 1396
+36.9%
Pentium N3710 1019

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 37% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium N4200 4595
+32%
Pentium N3710 3480

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 32% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Pentium N4200 4377
+27.5%
Pentium N3710 3433

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 27% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Pentium N4200 1561
+32.4%
Pentium N3710 1179

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3710 by 32% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.41 0.90
Integrated graphics card 0.86 0.72
Recency 1 September 2016 1 April 2016

The Pentium N4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium N3710 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3710, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium N4200
Pentium N4200
Intel Pentium N3710
Pentium N3710

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 618 votes

Rate Intel Pentium N4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 549 votes

Rate Intel Pentium N3710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium N4200 or Pentium N3710, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.