Pentium N3530 vs Pentium N4200

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pentium N4200
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
1.38
+81.6%
Pentium N3530
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
0.76

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 82% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20962512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Pentium
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2016 (7 years ago)23 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161no data
Current price$352 (2.2x MSRP)$223

Detailed Specifications

Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.58 GHz
L1 cacheno data224 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1296FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-+
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued
HD Audio+no data
RST--

Security technologies

Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3530 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR3, DDR4DDR3L-1333
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 505Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHz896 MHz
Execution Units18no data
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3530 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3530 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3530.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes64
USB revision2.0/3.03.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports85
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium N4200 1.38
+81.6%
Pentium N3530 0.76

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 82% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium N4200 2167
+82.6%
Pentium N3530 1187

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 83% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium N4200 272
+43.9%
Pentium N3530 189

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 44% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium N4200 701
+26.5%
Pentium N3530 554

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 27% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Pentium N4200 1653
+25.9%
Pentium N3530 1313

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 26% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium N4200 5217
+17.2%
Pentium N3530 4450

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 17% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Pentium N4200 22.58
+4.5%
Pentium N3530 23.6

Pentium N3530 outperforms Pentium N4200 by 5% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pentium N4200 2
+14.8%
Pentium N3530 2

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 15% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium N4200 163
+24.9%
Pentium N3530 131

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 25% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium N4200 52
+33.3%
Pentium N3530 39

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 33% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pentium N4200 0.65
+38.3%
Pentium N3530 0.47

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 38% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N4200 1.4
+400%
Pentium N3530 0.3

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 400% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N4200 944
Pentium N3530 1246
+32%

Pentium N3530 outperforms Pentium N4200 by 32% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N4200 60
+11.5%
Pentium N3530 54

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 12% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium N4200 12
+10.7%
Pentium N3530 11

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 11% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium N4200 1396
+40.5%
Pentium N3530 993

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 41% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium N4200 4595
+39.6%
Pentium N3530 3291

Pentium N4200 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 40% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.38 0.76
Recency 1 September 2016 23 February 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 7 Watt

The Pentium N4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium N3530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium N4200
Pentium N4200
Intel Pentium N3530
Pentium N3530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 622 votes

Rate Pentium N4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 133 votes

Rate Pentium N3530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium N4200 or Pentium N3530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.