Celeron J3355 vs Pentium N3700

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Pentium N3700
2015
4 cores / 4 threads
0.80
+3.9%
Celeron J3355
2016
2 cores / 2 threads
0.77

Pentium N3700 outperforms Celeron J3355 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Pentium N3700 and Celeron J3355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24702502
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Apollo Lake (2016)
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)1 September 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$107
Current price$358 (2.2x MSRP)$55 (0.5x MSRP)

Technical specs

Pentium N3700 and Celeron J3355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N3700 and Celeron J3355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3700 and Celeron J3355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP--
Smart Response--
GPIO++
Smart Connect--
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
HD Audio++
RST--

Security technologies

Pentium N3700 and Celeron J3355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Boot++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
OS Guard--
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3700 and Celeron J3355 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i--
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3700 and Celeron J3355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 SeriesIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memory8 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency700 MHz700 MHz
Execution Units1612
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3700 and Celeron J3355 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium N3700 and Celeron J3355 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX++
OpenGL++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3700 and Celeron J3355.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes46
USB revision2.0/3.02.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports22
Number of USB ports58
Integrated LAN--
UART++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium N3700 0.80
+3.9%
Celeron J3355 0.77

Pentium N3700 outperforms Celeron J3355 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium N3700 1242
+3.8%
Celeron J3355 1197

Pentium N3700 outperforms Celeron J3355 by 4% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium N3700 179
Celeron J3355 269
+50.3%

Celeron J3355 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 50% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium N3700 518
+21.3%
Celeron J3355 427

Pentium N3700 outperforms Celeron J3355 by 21% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium N3700 141
+56.7%
Celeron J3355 90

Pentium N3700 outperforms Celeron J3355 by 57% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Pentium N3700 37
Celeron J3355 48
+28.6%

Celeron J3355 outperforms Pentium N3700 by 29% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.80 0.77
Recency 1 April 2015 1 September 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Cost $161 $107
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between Pentium N3700 and Celeron J3355. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N3700 and Celeron J3355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium N3700
Pentium N3700
Intel Celeron J3355
Celeron J3355

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 309 votes

Rate Pentium N3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 51 vote

Rate Celeron J3355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium N3700 or Celeron J3355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.