Xeon Gold 5218 vs Pentium N3540

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium N3540
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.76
Xeon Gold 5218
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
13.63
+1693%

Xeon Gold 5218 outperforms Pentium N3540 by a whopping 1693% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium N3540 and Xeon Gold 5218 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2645539
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.70
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency9.5910.32
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$251$1,273

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium N3540 and Xeon Gold 5218 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2.16 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache224 KB1 MB
L2 cache2 MB16 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache22 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C87 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N3540 and Xeon Gold 5218 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3540 and Xeon Gold 5218. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Pentium N3540 and Xeon Gold 5218 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3540 and Xeon Gold 5218 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3540 and Xeon Gold 5218. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR4-2667
Maximum memory size8 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth21.32 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency896 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3540 and Xeon Gold 5218 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium N3540 and Xeon Gold 5218 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3540 and Xeon Gold 5218.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes448
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium N3540 0.76
Xeon Gold 5218 13.63
+1693%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium N3540 1200
Xeon Gold 5218 21651
+1704%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium N3540 192
Xeon Gold 5218 1157
+503%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium N3540 549
Xeon Gold 5218 8111
+1377%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 13.63
Recency 22 May 2014 2 April 2019
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 125 Watt

Pentium N3540 has 1685.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5218, on the other hand, has a 1693.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 5218 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium N3540 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium N3540 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5218 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N3540 and Xeon Gold 5218, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium N3540
Pentium N3540
Intel Xeon Gold 5218
Xeon Gold 5218

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 508 votes

Rate Pentium N3540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 22 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5218 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium N3540 or Xeon Gold 5218, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.