Core i3-1000NG4 vs Pentium N3530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium N3530
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.77
Core i3-1000NG4
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 9 Watt
2.32
+201%

i3-1000NG4 outperforms Pentium N3530 by a whopping 201% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium N3530 and Core i3-1000NG4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25921765
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Ice Lake
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Ice Lake Y (2020)
Release date23 February 2014 (10 years ago)20 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium N3530 and Core i3-1000NG4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.16 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache224 KB96 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data123 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N3530 and Core i3-1000NG4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170Intel BGA 1044
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3530 and Core i3-1000NG4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3530 and Core i3-1000NG4 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3530 and Core i3-1000NG4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data58.3 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD GraphicsIntel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3530 and Core i3-1000NG4.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium N3530 0.77
i3-1000NG4 2.32
+201%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium N3530 1184
i3-1000NG4 3582
+203%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium N3530 190
i3-1000NG4 1263
+565%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium N3530 544
i3-1000NG4 2250
+314%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium N3530 1313
i3-1000NG4 5771
+340%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium N3530 4450
i3-1000NG4 9257
+108%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium N3530 23.6
i3-1000NG4 16.2
+45.7%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Pentium N3530 2
i3-1000NG4 3
+49.5%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Pentium N3530 131
i3-1000NG4 333
+155%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Pentium N3530 39
i3-1000NG4 141
+262%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Pentium N3530 0.47
i3-1000NG4 1.49
+217%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Pentium N3530 1246
i3-1000NG4 2468
+98.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 2.32
Recency 23 February 2014 20 March 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 9 Watt

Pentium N3530 has 100% more physical cores, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

i3-1000NG4, on the other hand, has a 201.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-1000NG4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium N3530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N3530 and Core i3-1000NG4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium N3530
Pentium N3530
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
Core i3-1000NG4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 167 votes

Rate Pentium N3530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 58 votes

Rate Core i3-1000NG4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium N3530 or Core i3-1000NG4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.