Celeron 2.8 GHz vs Pentium N3520
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2981 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Pentium | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | 1 December 2013 (11 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $161 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Pentium N3520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.17 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.42 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 224 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium N3520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 128 KB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Smart Connect | + | no data |
| RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium N3520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1333 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 854 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3520 and Celeron 2.8 GHz.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 128 Watt |
Pentium N3520 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 490.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1728.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Pentium N3520 and Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
