Pentium N3520 vs E2-3800

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

E2-3800
2013
4 cores / 4 threads
0.74
+1.4%
Pentium N3520
2013
4 cores / 4 threads
0.73

E2-3800 outperforms Pentium N3520 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing E2-3800 and Pentium N3520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25432546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Pentium
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date23 May 2013 (10 years ago)1 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$161
Current price$107 $270 (1.7x MSRP)

Technical specs

E2-3800 and Pentium N3520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2.17 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz2.42 GHz
L1 cache128 KB224 KB
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E2-3800 and Pentium N3520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3800 and Pentium N3520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1600no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4no data
AVX+no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued
RSTno data-

Security technologies

E2-3800 and Pentium N3520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3800 and Pentium N3520 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3800 and Pentium N3520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3L-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8280Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
Graphics max frequencyno data854 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3800 and Pentium N3520 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3800 and Pentium N3520 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3800 and Pentium N3520.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3800 0.74
+1.4%
Pentium N3520 0.73

E2-3800 outperforms Pentium N3520 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E2-3800 1148
+0.6%
Pentium N3520 1141

E2-3800 outperforms Pentium N3520 by 1% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E2-3800 154
Pentium N3520 172
+11.7%

Pentium N3520 outperforms E2-3800 by 12% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

E2-3800 485
Pentium N3520 489
+0.8%

Pentium N3520 outperforms E2-3800 by 1% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

E2-3800 2295
+83.3%
Pentium N3520 1252

E2-3800 outperforms Pentium N3520 by 83% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E2-3800 3575
Pentium N3520 4328
+21%

Pentium N3520 outperforms E2-3800 by 21% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

E2-3800 42.64
Pentium N3520 28
+52.3%

E2-3800 outperforms Pentium N3520 by 52% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

E2-3800 1
Pentium N3520 2
+37.5%

Pentium N3520 outperforms E2-3800 by 38% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

E2-3800 103
Pentium N3520 144
+39.8%

Pentium N3520 outperforms E2-3800 by 40% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

E2-3800 28
Pentium N3520 38
+35.7%

Pentium N3520 outperforms E2-3800 by 36% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E2-3800 0.32
Pentium N3520 0.44
+37.5%

Pentium N3520 outperforms E2-3800 by 38% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-3800 0.8
+204%
Pentium N3520 0.3

E2-3800 outperforms Pentium N3520 by 204% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-3800 963
Pentium N3520 1204
+25%

Pentium N3520 outperforms E2-3800 by 25% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-3800 36
Pentium N3520 51
+42.2%

Pentium N3520 outperforms E2-3800 by 42% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-3800 8
Pentium N3520 10
+35.5%

Pentium N3520 outperforms E2-3800 by 35% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

E2-3800 777
Pentium N3520 918
+18.1%

Pentium N3520 outperforms E2-3800 by 18% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

E2-3800 2441
Pentium N3520 2940
+20.4%

Pentium N3520 outperforms E2-3800 by 20% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

E2-3800 2653
Pentium N3520 3220
+21.4%

Pentium N3520 outperforms E2-3800 by 21% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.74 0.73
Recency 23 May 2013 1 December 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 7 Watt

We couldn't decide between E2-3800 and Pentium N3520. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3800 and Pentium N3520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3800
E2-3800
Intel Pentium N3520
Pentium N3520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 65 votes

Rate E2-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 77 votes

Rate Pentium N3520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3800 or Pentium N3520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.