EPYC 7352 vs Pentium M 780
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7352 outperforms Pentium M 780 by a whopping 10264% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3493 | 304 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 8.92 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Pentium M | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 0.34 | 6.21 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Zen 2 (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 25 July 2005 (20 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,350 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Pentium M 780 and EPYC 7352: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.03 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 23 |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32 MB (per die) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | 87 mm2 | 4x 74 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 144 million | 15,200 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.26V-1.404V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 780 and EPYC 7352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 780 and EPYC 7352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Pentium M 780 and EPYC 7352 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 780 and EPYC 7352 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 780 and EPYC 7352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 780 and EPYC 7352.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.22 | 22.80 |
| Recency | 25 July 2005 | 7 August 2019 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 155 Watt |
Pentium M 780 has 474% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7352, on the other hand, has a 10264% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 7352 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium M 780 in performance tests.
Be aware that Pentium M 780 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7352 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
