A8-3800 vs Core i7-2655LE

Primary Details

Comparing Core i7-2655LE and A8-3800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2159	2149
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.03	2.06
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Core i7	no data
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Llano (2011−2012)
Release date	no data	30 June 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$346	no data
Current price	$4071 (11.8x MSRP)	$40

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A8-3800 has 6767% better value for money than i7-2655LE.

Detailed Specifications

Core i7-2655LE and A8-3800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	no data	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.2 GHz	2.7 GHz
Bus support	4 × 5 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	4 MB	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	228 mm2
Number of transistors	624 Million	1,178 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2655LE and A8-3800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	no data	FM1
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2655LE and A8-3800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	no data
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	no data
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2655LE and A8-3800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

+

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2655LE and A8-3800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2655LE and A8-3800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	no data	DDR3
Maximum memory size	16 GB	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	21.335 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare

Intel HD Graphics 3000

AMD Radeon HD 6550D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-3800 outperforms Core i7-2655LE by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Performance score	1.29	1.31
Integrated graphics card	0.66	1.03
Physical cores	2	4
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2655LE and A8-3800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---