Celeron J1800 vs Pentium M 765

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 765 and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date20 October 2004 (20 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$72

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 765 and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.58 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KB112 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography90 nm22 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.988-1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 765 and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bit36 Bit
FDIno data-
FSB parity-no data
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Pentium M 765 and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium M 765 and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron J1800.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 October 2004 1 November 2013
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 10 Watt

Pentium M 765 has 42.9% lower power consumption.

Celeron J1800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 309.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 765 and Celeron J1800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 765 and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 765
Pentium M 765
Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Pentium M 765 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 533 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 765 or Celeron J1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.