EPYC 7H12 vs Pentium M 735

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 735
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.18
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
43.84
+24256%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Pentium M 735 by a whopping 24256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking324548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesPentium MAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.8114.82
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date10 May 2004 (20 years ago)18 September 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads1128
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache32 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size87 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors144 million4,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.988V-1.34Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketPPGA478TR4
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.18 43.84
Recency 10 May 2004 18 September 2019
Physical cores 1 64
Threads 1 128
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 280 Watt

Pentium M 735 has 3900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7H12, on the other hand, has a 24255.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 735 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium M 735 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 735 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 735
Pentium M 735
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 12 votes

Rate Pentium M 735 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 735 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.