Ultra 9 288V vs Pentium M 735

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 735
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.18
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.52
+6856%

Core Ultra 9 288V outperforms Pentium M 735 by a whopping 6856% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 735 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3262623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium Mno data
Power efficiency0.8139.50
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date10 May 2004 (20 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 735 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed1.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz37 MHz
L1 cache32 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm3 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.988V-1.34Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 735 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 735 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 735 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 735 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 735 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Arc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 735 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium M 735 0.18
Ultra 9 288V 12.52
+6856%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium M 735 1459
Ultra 9 288V 10697
+633%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium M 735 698
Ultra 9 288V 12505
+1693%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.18 12.52
Recency 10 May 2004 24 September 2024
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 90 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 30 Watt

Pentium M 735 has 328.6% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has a 6855.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 288V is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 735 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 735 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 735
Pentium M 735
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 12 votes

Rate Pentium M 735 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 35 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 735 or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.