Celeron 3865U vs Pentium M 725

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 725
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.18
Celeron 3865U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.83
+361%

Celeron 3865U outperforms Pentium M 725 by a whopping 361% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 725 and Celeron 3865U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32492580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MIntel Celeron
Power efficiency0.815.24
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Kaby Lake-U (2017)
Release date23 June 2004 (20 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 725 and Celeron 3865U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rate400 MHz4 GT/s
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache32 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size87 mm298.7 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.988V-1.34Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 725 and Celeron 3865U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478FCBGA1356,FPBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 725 and Celeron 3865U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 725 and Celeron 3865U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB-+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 725 and Celeron 3865U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 725 and Celeron 3865U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data900 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium M 725 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium M 725 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium M 725 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 725 and Celeron 3865U.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data10

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium M 725 0.18
Celeron 3865U 0.83
+361%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium M 725 1400
Celeron 3865U 2853
+104%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.18 0.83
Recency 23 June 2004 3 January 2017
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

Pentium M 725 has 114.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron 3865U, on the other hand, has a 361.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron 3865U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 725 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 725 and Celeron 3865U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 725
Pentium M 725
Intel Celeron 3865U
Celeron 3865U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Pentium M 725 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 116 votes

Rate Celeron 3865U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 725 or Celeron 3865U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.