Apple M1 vs Pentium M 1300

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 1300 and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MApple Apple M-Series
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)no data
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 1300 and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data2 MB
L2 cacheno data16 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography130 nm5 nm
Number of transistorsno data16000 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 1300 and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Wattno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium M 1300 197
Apple M1 8207
+4066%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 1300 and Apple M1. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 1300 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 1300
Pentium M 1300
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Pentium M 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2236 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 1300 or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.