Xeon Gold 5320H vs Pentium M 1.60
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 5320H outperforms Pentium M 1.60 by a whopping 16542% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 1.60 and Xeon Gold 5320H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3361 | 285 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.47 | 12.60 |
| Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | March 2003 (21 year ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 1.60 and Xeon Gold 5320H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 40 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 27.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 100 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 77 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 1.60 and Xeon Gold 5320H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 4 |
| Socket | 478 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 1.60 and Xeon Gold 5320H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Pentium M 1.60 and Xeon Gold 5320H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 1.60 and Xeon Gold 5320H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 1.60 and Xeon Gold 5320H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR4 RDIMM |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.12 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 1.60 and Xeon Gold 5320H.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.12 | 19.97 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 20 |
| Threads | 1 | 40 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24 Watt | 150 Watt |
Pentium M 1.60 has 525% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5320H, on the other hand, has a 16541.7% higher aggregate performance score, 1900% more physical cores and 3900% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
The Xeon Gold 5320H is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 1.60 in performance tests.
Be aware that Pentium M 1.60 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5320H is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 1.60 and Xeon Gold 5320H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
